By which a person is directed in order that e may be able to bring eir entire Self to bear in the accomplishment of eir Will; and, with a determination free from affections hurtful to this end, fulfill the dharma of eir life.
In the first place, in order that by exercises of this kind, as well e who gives as e who receives them may be profited, it must be presupposed that every pious person ought with a more ready mind to put a good sense upon an obscure opinion or proposition of another than to condemn it; but if e can in no way defend it, let em inquire the meaning of the speaker, and if in thinking or meaning e be alien to one's own thinking or meaning, present one's own thinking or meaning with lovingkindness; if this suffice not, try all suitable means by which e may render em sound in meaning and safe from unrecognized and unintended illogic.
THE BEGINNING OR FOUNDATION.
We have this as our end, that we might discern, discover, and develop our own Will, and, accomplishing this, at length fulfill our dharma, which is specific to each individual. And the other things on this earth, though they have their own lives and their own values, might be enlisted to assist us in pursuing this goal, once one has built a strong relationship with them over time and exchange of relations of various sorts: whence it follows, that the closeness of one's relationships with each and every thing may be in proportion as they may profit or hinder em in pursuing that end, but that any relationship, regardless of its closeness, be marked by mutual respect. Wherefore we ought to be joyful in and with all created things (*and honourable in so far as they are subject to the liberty of our will and we are to theirs, and respectful in our recognition that we are whole and divine in our own will and they in theirs), so that (to the best of our power) we enjoy sickness as much health, and poverty equally to riches, contempt as much as honour, a short life equally to a long one. But it is useful, out of all, to choose and desire those things most deeply which lead to the end.**
DAILY AND PARTICULAR EXAMINATION,
Embracing three times, fitted for the disposing of one's self, and a two-fold sifting.
The first time is that of the morning; in which a person ought, as soon as e rises from sleep and completes an Iron, Pearl, and/or Plastic Pentacle (any other such ritual may be added to that list as well) for the purpose of diagnosis, to propose the diligent guarding of eirself concerning some particular failing or complex, from which e desires to amend himself.
The second is, that of the afternoon; in which e must ask of Antinoius Nauigator to look back upon eir journey through the day and to remind em that e might remember how often e has acted out of or reenacted that particular failing or complex, and to mark the oncoming path that e might be aware of it for the future (divination, here, for both parts is highly appropriate): then let em perform the first sifting, asking account of eir Holy Guardian Angel concerning the failing or complex already spoken of, and, running through the several past parts of the day, from the hour in which e rose down to the present, how many times e has committed it, and mark so many points in the first line of the figure represented below. Which being finished, let em propose again through the remaining space of the day to act with presence, mindfulness, and intention.
The third time will be that of the evening; in which, after the hour of supper, the second sifting will have to be made, by running through in like manner the several hours which have elapsed from the former to the present examination; and in the same way remembering and enumerating the times e has acted out of the complex or failing, e will mark the same number of points in the second line of a figure like the one below, prepared for the purpose.
Four Useful Additions
For the easier and quicker resolution of any complex or failing,
The first is, that as often as one has acted out of or reenacted that kind of complex or failing, putting eir hand to eir breast, e grieve for the opportunity which has been missed, which may be done, even when others are present, without their perceiving it.
The second is, that at night, having counted and compared together the points of the lines, of which the upper is assigned to the first, the lower to the second examination, e observe whether from the
former to the latter any amendment have intervened.
The third is, that e compare together the examinations of the second and the preceding day, considering whether any amendment has taken place in em.
The fourth, that, comparing together in like manner the examinations of two weeks, e take account of the amendment made or omitted.
Also it must be noted, that, of the following figures, the first, which is longer than the rest, is assigned to the first day, say the Sunday; the second, which is a little shorter, to the Monday; and so in succession, it being reasonable that the number of events to record should decrease daily.
__________________________________________
________________________________________
______________________________________
____________________________________
__________________________________
________________________________
______________________________
____________________________
__________________________
________________________
______________________
____________________
__________________
________________
GENERAL EXAMINATION OF CONSCIENCE,
Most useful for cleansing, banishing, and purification, and inviting one's demons over for tea.
It is presupposed that there happen to a person two kinds of thoughts; the first arising from eir own proper motion, but the other coming from without, namely, from the suggestion of a daimon.
Concerning Thought.
In two ways is merit drawn from distracting or useless thought in the matter of the hooks which catch the Will, concerning which kind of thought we here speak.
By the first, when there is suggested a thought concerning acting out of or reenacting some complex or failure, but by resisting immediately it is overcome.
By the second, when a suggestion of this kind having been repelled once and again, and returning every now and then, a person continually maintains eir Will, until that element of eir relationship with that daimon which is distractive, hindering, or useless transmutes utterly; which kind of success deservedly excels the other.
But a person contravenes lightly his own Will when upon the thought of distraction, hindrance, or uselessness which has arisen e dwells some little, as it were listening and by such listening gifting the thought with eir energy or power, or when e is affected passingly by any pleasure of sense which does not empower eir own Will, or shows eirself negligent in repelling it.
But difficulty in accomplishing one's Will is received by thought in two ways.
First, when to the thought of giving one's sovereignty over to one's complexes or failings consent is in any way given.
Secondly, when that complex or failing is enacted in deed: and this is more grievous than the other, for three reasons, namely; on account of the greater length of time; on account of the more intense action; and on account of the greater number affected.
Concerning Words.
By word also is one's Will in many ways thwarted; as in misrepresenting oneself, in imprudent speech, in useless humility. For we must not mindlessly vow, either to the gods or to any other being, unless with the concurrence of these three things: truth, necessity, and reverence. Moreover necessity is to be understood, not of the affirmation of whatever is true, but of that only which is of importance concerning some spiritual, corporal, or at least temporal advantage. By reverence we mean, when e who mentions the name of a god uses consideration, that to that god and the gods in general due honour may be given. It must be understood, however, that although an oath by the gods, taken rashly or vainly, is a more grievous sin than one to any other being, it is nevertheless more difficult to swear lawfully, observing the due circumstances which we have mentioned, by the latter than by the former.
First, because in making mention of any being in an oath, we are not so much stirred up or rendered attentive to swear from truth and necessity, as when we name that which compels us to awe and reverence (that is to say, a god, daimon, or numen).
Secondly, because we are far less forcibly moved to give the world honour with reverence, by the mention of any being, than by that of those things which compel us to awe and reverence. Wherefore to swear by any being is better done rather by the perfect, than to those of the duller or the more ordinary sort; since the perfect, by the continual use of contemplation and by the illumination of the understanding, consider more closely, and discover that the divine exists in and as the essence, presence, and power of every creature; whence they are better prepared than others who are not yet advanced to that point of perfection, to give the world due reverence in an oath.
Thirdly, because, if any being was too frequently named for the confirmation of an oath, consideration must be given that that being may be undergoing deification, and the transition must be navigated mindfully; a hazard more to be feared for the imperfect than for the perfect.
-------
* In the Foundation, where it is said
in so far as they are subject to the liberty of our will, it would be said more clearly from the autograph
in so far as it is left to the liberty of our will.
** At the end of the Foundation, where we have
which lead to the end, it should be read
which lead us to the end of discerning, discovering, and developing our own Will.